Nancy E. Carroll & Michael Kaye in "Mothers and Sons" (photo: Craig Bailey/Perspective Photo) |
Strictly speaking, “Mothers and Sons” isn't a
sequel, though it features two characters from the earlier work, and
the current play opens similarly to the previous one, with a lengthy
monologue by Cal Porter (Michael Kaye), as Andre's mother Katherine
Gerard (Nancy E. Carroll), stands in silence. This time, however, her
silence is broken, even before the arrival home of Cal's husband Will
Ogden (Nile Hawver) and their six-year-old son Bud Ogden-Porter (Liam
Lurker). Like it or not, Cal is Katherine's last link to Andre,
through whom she once hoped to live her life vicariously, perhaps
expecting too much of him, and unable to let him go. She's concerned
about her legacy disappearing when she dies, and denigrates the
concept of love, lowering it to the level of mere comfort and
concern. She opines that “people don't change”, but it becomes
quite apparent that at least Cal has, and perhaps she has, too, given
her long-overdue appearance. She ultimately declares that it is not
closure she seeks, but revenge. Cal, on the other hand, has moved on
from his initial bitterness at his loss, and made a new life for
himself. He's even able to bemoan the marginalization of the AIDS
epidemic as a chapter in history that will become in the future of
society merely a paragraph, eventually a footnote. He's comfortable
in describing his discomfort, at first, with the term “husband”
as applied to Will, and in his implicit condemnation of bigotry in
his stating that gay couples “weren't allowed the dignity of
marriage; maybe that's why AIDS happened”.
As for Katherine, it eventually becomes clear that,
while the ostensible reason she has suddenly materialized is to
return something Cal had sent her, the true reason for her arrival is
infinitely more complicated. Lies and secrets are revealed, not in a
melodramatic manner, but in one that is integral to the
story. Though the structure of the play is old-fashioned (having
players exit for the bathroom, for example, in order to facilitate
various confrontational scenes), make no mistake about it. This is a
radical play, if for no other reason than the depiction of its core
family in all its mundane normalcy. Yet Cal admits the discrepancy in
his relationship is “generational...I never expected to be a
father. (Will) never expected not to be one”. That, in a nutshell,
is McNally's genius of observation of society's seismic shift, and no
doubt why the title features plural nouns. In a mere ninety minutes,
which seem to fly by, he has captured and encapsulated so much about
longing and loneliness, dealing with our unresolved anger, and
forgiveness (of others and ourselves) and even redemption. His stark
depiction of the transformation in society's thoughts and feelings
about family (and its diversity today), with same-gender couples
being good parents, is so devastatingly brilliant that it might well
take your breath away.
As Director Paul Daigneault, the company's Producing
Artistic Director, writes in the program notes, this was the first
Broadway play to feature as its protagonists a legally married gay
couple. It profits from the passion and compassion of its author.
While it's partly about AIDS, it's from the perspective, not of the
disease itself, but that of the people that it affected, their
personal grief, and the degrees of individual and social change, and
sometimes lack thereof, that has occurred in the last two decades. In
the playwright's words, it's about “those left behind...about what
AIDS is doing to human relationships”. It features four
generations, each with a specific view towards the disease. McNally,
who has had a lengthy and prolific career (with four Tony Awards, and
another nomination for this season's Best Book of a Musical, “The
Visit”, as well as a current Broadway revival of his “It's Only a
Play”), has an uncanny ear for truth. In “Andre's Mother”, Cal
expressed his desire: “I've always had it in my mind that one day
we would be friends, you and me” yet admitted that “the only
thing that frightened (Andre) was you”. By the final scene, your
heart and soul may well be sung “by flights of angels to your
rest”. While “Mothers and Sons” is at one and the same time
old-fashioned, as noted above, and groundbreaking, it's worth is in
its truth.
Daigneault has firmly recognized this in his wonderful
direction of this remarkable cast. None of this foursome ever hits a
wrong note, including the very believable Hawver (who manages in just
a few nuanced lines to reveal that his character is a tad
controlling, not a plaster saint) and the utterly natural support of young Lurker. But it's the work of Kaye
and Carroll that commands our attention, and rightly so. Kaye's Cal
is complex and heartbreakingly real in a very difficult role to
inhabit, yet he does so supremely well. Carroll's Katherine may well
be her finest work to date (and that's saying a whole lot, given her
many unforgettable appearances in a remarkably varied career).
Whether admiring her deadpan delivery of some of McNally's best
lines, or her continual reacting in character, you simply can't take
your eyes off of her. On the technical side, the Scenic Design by
Erik D. Diaz and Costume Design by Charles Schoonmaker perfectly
capture the naturalness of the normal life of the family, and the
Lighting Design by Jeff Adelberg and Sound Design by David Remedios
are equally right for the work.
In the end, this is a play that shouldn't fail to move
even the most jaded theatergoer to the point of tears, and beyond.
Its honesty is that astonishing. It's not only a play, it's a truly
moving shared experience. One might ask, in the end, is this play
manipulative? Of course it is, but in a very positive sense...the way
all theater can and should be, especially great theater such as this.
No comments:
Post a Comment