Anna Botsford & Elliot Sicard in "Unsafe" (photo: Jim Dalglish) |
Whether they are in the fast lane or a bit more
established, the characters in the play Unsafe share a
commonality, namely that life post 9/11 is unsafe at any speed. This
work by Jim Dalglish, a Boston Public Works' co-production with
Cotuit Center for the Arts, is now being presented at the Plaza Theater at Boston Center for the
Arts April 15-30. A semifinalist at the 2008 National Playwright's
Conference, it's quite accurately described in the program as a
psychological thriller. As such, and as is the case with many
mysteries, it presents a challenge for any reviewer: how to critique
a work that fundamentally depends on the playwright's gradual
revealing of pieces of the jigsaw puzzle in which these characters
find themselves. By and large, the play succeeds at this process,
but describing precisely how it does so would be to ruin a
theatergoer's appreciation of the many revelations without spoiling
one's experience with, well, spoilers. The tagline for the show, “be
careful who you let inside”, while grammatically questionable, can
also serve as a caveat for reviewing any play in which so much
information is initially withheld: be careful whom you let in on your
plot points. That said, there's enough to share to whet one's
appetite for such an intriguing work.
In 2003 New York, a family is attempting to pick up the pieces of their lives (for some, almost literally) in the midst of a midwinter New York City blizzard with three feet of snow. It's the occasion of the fortieth birthday of Lisa (Anna Botsford), with her parents Yvonne (Michelle Pelletier) and Guy (H. Kempton Parker) in attendance, along with, curiously, Nathaniel (Tony Travostino), a neurologist who has been studying a disorder afflicting Lisa's daughter Georgie (at the opening performance, Alexandra Tsourides, alternating thereafter with her sister Natalia). It's a rare condition known as Williams Syndrome, occurring with missing chromosomal information, simultaneously resulting in health problems and exceptional verbal and musical precocity. The festivities are interrupted by the unexpected arrival of Will (Elliot Sicard), whose relationship to the family is initially unclear. As the play progresses, there are several surprises that clarify not only the issues currently on hand, but the historical reasons why these family members are so deeply wounded as a result of the iconic terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, especially with the still extant fallout from that tragedy. It has resulted in a pervasive feeling of life as unsafe; as the playwright puts it, “the terror, the pain, the fear that it feeds on...it's here”.
Before the first word of dialogue is spoken, while
theatergoers are finding their seats, we're presented with a group of
characters referred to as the “Wild Boys” (Chris Crider, Peter G.
Lemire, Ian Morris, Lang Haynes, Nicholas Stewart, and Nick
Bucchianeri) who hover and mime menacingly, none of them losing
character throughout the course of the show. It's part of an overall
unity of concept reflected in the imaginative Scenic Design of a loft
apartment by Tristan DiVincenzo (especially an increasingly ominous
elevator), as well as the varied Costume Design by Greta Bieg (right
down to the holes in Will's socks), effective Lighting Design by Greg
Hamm and Sound Design and Musical Composition by Nathan Leigh. How
these “Wild Boys” and the creative team's efforts contribute to
the effect of the play are also potential spoilers. Suffice it to
say that the aforementioned elevator in the renovated complex that
Lisa and her daughter continue to inhabit plays a role in
establishing a sense of dread. Even the scene changes are handled
ingeniously.
As it stands now, this is a taut, engrossing work by a
clever playwright who also happens to be the director of the current
production. The insight into the underbelly of the play is thus
undoubtedly a plus, though it may have resulted in some ambiguity,
particularly in the first part of the final scene, where it's unclear
that six months have passed and whom the characters in the scene are
mourning. That said, it would be an easy fix, eliminating some
confusion on the part of the audience as to when and where we are as
the play winds down to its devastating climax. There are a few bits
of dialogue that sound out of character, such as Will's description
of people either as simple as a single cartoon panel or as complex as
a five-hundred-page novel. For the most part, though, Dalglish has a
great ear for his multifaceted cast, most of whom don't disappoint.
Botsford (tightly wound and increasingly unraveling) and Sicard (with
his expressively labile face) are very impressive, each with an
opportunity to deliver an aria-like turn, and Tsourides is amazingly
believable for such a young performer. Not since “The Miracle
Worker” has a play depended so profoundly on the skill of a child
actor. There were some problems with projection and diction on the
part of some of the rest of the cast, but these will probably be
resolved with more familiarity with the material.
At a crucial point in the dramatic arc of the play, Lisa
explains that one of the reasons she remains in her building and
cannot leave yet is that it too is “one of the pieces” of the
aftermath of tragedy. Dalglish has pulled off a remarkable feat,
taking something we all feel we've survived and assimilated, and
making the ultimate reveal, namely that we have all been forever
changed and, denial aside, we now must be wary, vigilant and, if not
precisely unsafe, at least unsettled. This playwright saw something,
and said something.
No comments:
Post a Comment